|
CUBAN LIBRARIES
SOLIDARITY GROUP June
12, 2003 Cuba desires ever-widening relations with the European Union, but they must be based on mutual respect. THE Cuban government
has been obliged to once again withdraw its application to join the Cotonou
Agreement regulating economic cooperation relations between the European
Union (EU) and the 79 countries that make up the Africa, Caribbean and
Pacific Group (ACP). The first time that Cuba applied for inclusion in the Cotonou Agreement was on March 10, 2000. This was in response to interests of solidarity from the Caribbean countries that were urging Cuba to join in a fraternal gesture of friendship that our country will always appreciate, because they believed that it would aid Cuba's integration into the Caribbean and improve the framework of relations with the European Union. Cuba was not pursuing access quotas to the European market or additional cooperation resources from the Union - which are, moreover, scant - but was fully aware that its entry would in no way affect the legitimate interests of its Caribbean sister nations. It was exclusively the interest of responding to the support of the Caribbean countries initially and then the ACP Group as a whole that led Cuba to apply for adherence. However, this application was frustrated when Cuba was obliged to withdraw it due to the fact that various European Union members, headed by the Spanish government of José Maria Aznar and the British government, attempted to establish additional and discriminatory requirements for Cuba. In addition, they wanted to carry out an inspection of our country prior to our entry. On the other hand,
the decision-making system in force in European Union, that requires the
unanimous vote of the 15 member countries, made it easier for a small
group of countries opposed to Cuba's entry from the outset, to achieve
their objective. For all these reasons,
and also in response to the diverse European countries that have expressed
support for us, urging us to apply for inclusion once again; likewise,
in this context, taking into account the positive position maintained
by European Commissioner Poul Nielson who visited our country to inaugurate
the European Union embassy in Havana; and as an expression of our will
to develop relations with the European Union, Cuba made a second attempt
and once again applied for entry into the agreement on January 8, 2003. In making this decision, Cuba has not overlooked the fact that, in the wake of the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the emergence of a unipolar world, plus the difficult years during which moreover, Cuba has had to put up with an intensification of the blockade to which it is subjected by the hegemonic superpower, the European Union has been incapable of adopting its own policy on Cuba, based on Europe's real interests. To confirm this, it is sufficient to read the document titled "A common European Union position on Cuba," an interventionist text that Aznar's government imposed on its community partners at the urging of the United States. We recall the inexplicable European reaction to the Helms-Burton Act when, instead of leading the international rejection of a U.S. law in violation of its rights, it preferred to reach a so-called understanding between the European Union and the United States, in a shameful page of community foreign policy. Cuba wishes ever-widening relations with the European Union, with which it shares profound historical and cultural links, from which countries it receives almost one million tourists, and with whose members it has trade relations worth almost $1.9 billion dollars per year, but such relations must be based on mutual respect, on non-interference in internal affairs and the recognition of the right of each party to freely elect its economic and social system, institutions and laws. The recent European Union decisions on Cuba obviate the unquestionable fact that within a strict framework of respect for its laws, Cuba has been obliged to adopt decisions to confront a plan to provoke a military confrontation with the United States, precisely after the aggression against and occupation of Iraq, in which, clearly, certain of the most fervent European critics of Cuba were the accomplices of the U.S. "hawks" behind the backs of their people and European Union decisions. Moreover, they are feigning ignorance of the fact that Cuba is confronting an attempt to make it yield by force and that the government harassing our country is aspiring to impose a world fascist dictatorship on the rest of the world, including the European nations. If the representatives of the European Union had lived under a blockade that has already lasted more than 44 years and had had to suffer, like us, aggressions, armed invasions, terrorist attacks, plots to assassinate their leaders, and a brutal campaign of discredit and lies, maybe they would better understand the injustice being committed against Cuba by the European Union. Cuba has resisted
more than 44 years of blockade, aggressions and threats from the United
States without yielding, and does not see any reason to accept pressure
from any other nation whatsoever. |